Underground coal gasification (UCG) - Potential to increase coal reserve worldwide:

Underground coal gasification (UCG) - Potential to increase coal reserve worldwide:

Introduction: Worldwide, coal reserves are quite vast - over 10 trillion tonnes. However, unless cleaner and cheaper ways can be found to convert coal to gas or liquid fuels, coal is unlikely to become an acceptable replacement for dwindling and uncertain supplies of oil and natural gas. Mining coal is dangerous work. Coal is dirty to burn and much of the coal in the ground is too deep or too low in quality to be mined economically. Today, less than one sixth of the world’s coal is economically accessible. However, there is a renewed interest world over to revive the old technology that offers promise to substantially increase usable coal reserves and make coal a clean and economic alternative fuel. Known as underground coal gasification (UCG), this technology converts coal to a combustible gas underground.

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) is the process by which coal is converted in situ into a combustible gas that can be used as a fuel or chemical feedstock. It is a process to convert unminable underground coal/lignite into combustible gases (i.e., combustible syngas – a combination of hydrogen and carbon monoxide) by gasifying. UCG uses a similar process to surface gasification. The main difference between both gasification processes is that in UCG the cavity itself becomes the reactor so that the gasification of the coal takes place underground instead of at the surface.

Despite considerable research and testing, no commercially viable project has yet been demonstrated anywhere. Research has been conducted principally in Western Europe, USA, China, the former Soviet Union and Australia.

Benefits of UCG - As a method of exploiting coal, UCG represents an environmental improvement on the combination of coal mining and surface combustion of coal. It is also safer and intuitively more efficient.

Environmental benefits of UCG over underground coal mining for fuelling power generation include:

(i) Lower fugitive dust, noise and visual impact on the surface

(ii) Lower water consumption

(iii) Low risk of surface water pollution

(iv) Reduced methane emissions

(v) No dirt handling and disposal at mine sites

(vi) No coal washing and fines disposal at mine sites

(vii) No ash handling and disposal at power station sites

(viii) No coal stocking and transport

(ix) Smaller surface footprints at power stations

(x) No mine water recovery and significant surface hazard liabilities on abandonment.

Additional benefits include:

(i) Health and safety

(ii) Potentially lower overall capital and operating costs

(iii) Flexibility of access to mineral

(iv) Larger coal resource exploitable

Note: At present, natural gas offers attractions as a clean fuel that UCG may find difficult to compete.

Process of Underground Coal Gasification (UCG):

The basic UCG process involves drilling two wells into the coal, one for injection of the oxidants (water/air or water/oxygen mixtures) and another well some distance away to bring the product gas to the surface. Coal is gasified underground by creating a linkage through the coal seam between the injection and production wells and injecting air (or oxygen) and water (or steam) into the underground reaction zone. The injected gases react with coal to form a combustible gas which is brought to the surface in a production well, cleaned and used as a fuel or chemical feedstock. A cavity is formed as the coal burns and the roof collapses. This results in lateral growth and is allowed to continue until the product gas quality deteriorates. The greater the lateral growth, the longer the life of a gasifier and the more cost-effective the operation. When the quality of the product gas falls, fresh coal is ignited further along the injection well. Once the coal within the underground gasifier has been exhausted, new injection and production wells are drilled and the process is repeated.

Injecting oxygen rather than air reduces the nitrogen content and raises the heating value of the produced gas to the ‘medium-Btu’ gas range – of heating value roughly one-fourth of natural gas. If the goal is high-Btu gas (also called as substitute natural gas or SNG), the percentage of methane in the produced gases needs to be boosted. For methane formation in UCG, two additional steps are required. First, some of the carbon monoxide made in the gasification process is reacted with steam to form additional hydrogen. This step, called shift conversion, sets up the proper ratio of gases for the next step called methanation. The hot gas thus produced is allowed to pass through the coal seam to the exit boreholes and is carried to the surface where it is cleaned and upgraded for use. The whole aspect is elaborated in next paragraphs.

In fact, gasification differs from combustion which takes place when coal is burned in excess oxygen to produce carbon dioxide and water. Another important difference between coal combustion and coal gasification is in pollutant formation. The reducing atmosphere in gasification converts sulphur (S) from coal to hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and nitrogen (N) to ammonia (NH3), whereas combustion (oxidation) produces sulphur dioxide (SO2) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx).

The principal processes can be divided into two stages, namely (i) pyrolysis (also known as carbonisation, devolatilisation or thermal decomposition) and (ii) gasification. During pyrolysis coal is converted to a char releasing tars, oils, low molecular hydrocarbons and other gases. Gasification occurs when water, oxygen, carbon oxide and hydrogen react with the char.

The main gases produced are carbon dioxide, methane (CH4), hydrogen and carbon monoxide (CO) and oxygen. CH4 is essentially a product of pyrolysis, rather than gasification. Its formation is favoured by low temperature and high pressure.

In a theoretical appraisal of the gasification process, the Autothermal Chemical Equilibrium (ACE) condition exists. This is a condition at which the heat value of the product gas and the conversion efficiency of the gasified coal (chemical energy of product gas/chemical energy of gasified coal) is a maximum. At high temperatures and pressures (say 5MPa, 900°C), ACE conditions are approached rapidly but at lower temperatures and pressures the time to attain equilibrium greatly exceed the residence time of the gases in the gasifier and therefore ACE will not be attained.

The basic reactions can be generalised to a simple empirical form:

C + O2 → CO2 (+heat)

C + CO2 (+heat) → 2CO

C + H2O (+heat) → H2 + CO

C + 2H2 → CH4 (+heat)

During pyrolysis coal, subjected to high temperatures, yields higher heat value gases than ACE gasification products for a relatively small consumption of O2. Pressure increases the proportion of coal pyrolysed to form methane thus raising the heat value of the product gases. There is also some evidence to suggest that elevated pressures cause pyrolysis processes to penetrate in situ coal, further enhancing the gasifier yield.

Gasification circuit and Cavity behaviour: The gasification circuit requires a flow link to be achieved between an injection and a production well. Methods of achieving the link are:

* Accurate drilling assisted by a target device in the vertical well if necessary.

* Reverse combustion, involving ignition at the base of the production well.

Initially, channel created in coal seam using special drilling techniques. As reaction proceeds, channel grows, creating underground ‘cavity’. Volume of cavity increases progressively with progress of reaction.

Installation of well pairs (injection and production wells) is costly and therefore it is desirable to gasify the maximum volume of coal between a well pair. As gasification proceeds, a cavity is formed which will extend until the roof collapses. This roof collapse is important as it aids the lateral growth of the gasifier. Where the roof is strong and fails to break, or where the broken ground is blocky and poorly consolidated, some fluid reactants will by-pass the coal and the reactor efficiency could decline rapidly.

The most successful gasifier or reactor control process, developed in the USA, involves the use of a burner attached to coiled tubing. The device is used to burn through the borehole casing and ignite the coal. The ignition system can be moved to any desired location in the injection well. This ‘controlled retraction of ignition point’ (CRIP) technique enables a new reactor to be started at any chosen upstream location after a declining reactor has been abandoned.

Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS): If the CO2 is to be captured at the surface and sequestered, it must be separated from the syngas. At a UCG production site, a significant percentage of the CO2 would likely be sequestered in the void left by the burned coal seam. Ideally, remaining CO2 can be sequestered in deep geologic formations nearby.

If the CO2 is not sequestered in place, it can be piped to oil fields. Oil companies can then inject it underground to increase production from oil and natural gas wells, a process called enhanced oil recovery. This represents an opportunity to sequester carbon at a lower cost compared with storing it in geologic repositories.

Monitoring and Control: In order for the gasification process to be controlled, it is essential that continuous analytical measurement of the product gas stream is available.

Injection flow rate and composition, temperature and pressure were measured at various parts of the circuit to facilitate control of the gasifier and to ensure pressure and temperature design limits of system components were not exceeded. The manipulation of the following variables allowed the reaction rate and the gas quality to be adjusted within certain limits:

(i) Injected gas flow rate and composition

(ii) Reactor back pressure

(iii) Production well base temperature

(iv) Safety monitoring and alarm control

Technical requirements: Important technical requirements and considerations in designing a commercial gas production scheme:

(i) A cost-effective means of acquiring high-resolution coal seam geological data

(ii) Reproducible drilling accuracy

(iii) Multiple, independent gasifier units (with separate injection and production wells) to ensure systems failures do not totally halt gas production

(iv) Integrated surface plant using readily available off-the-shelf equipment wherever practicable.

The most critical element of deep UCG is arguably the directional drilling. Technologies exist which are capable of achieving the required precision but there is considerable uncertainty about the general drillability of coal seams in other than ideal conditions.

Environmental Impact and its Control: The main environmental issues concerning UCG are:

(i) Atmospheric emissions;

(ii) Surface water;

(iii) Drinking water pollutants;

(iv) Noise;

(v) Site operations;

(vi) Groundwater;

(vii) Subsidence.

Conclusion: Today, high prices of oil and gas and uncertainties about political stability in most of oil producing countries, have renewed interest in all kinds of fuel. A renewed interest in coal gasification is therefore not surprising. Further-more, hydrogen is now a welcome by-product because of the current interest in alternatively fuelled vehicles. UCG is potentially the most important clean coal technology of the future with worldwide application. Ultimately, it could be a substitute for deep mining coal for power generation use.

Applying improved UCG technology to gasify deep, thin, and low grade coal seams could vastly increase the amount of exploitable reserves. The coal could be converted to gas for a variety of uses and emissions of sulphur, nitrous oxides and mercury could be dramatically reduced. UCG could increase recoverable coal reserves by as much as 300 to 400 percent. Another benefit of UCG is that hydrogen accounts for nearly half the total gas product which can be separated and actively used as automotive fuel or as feed-stock for the Chemical Industry.

Countries are turning to UCG to fully utilize their coal resources in an economically viable and environmentally acceptable manner. Using UCG technology even without a carbon-capture-and-sequestration plan could also be eligible for carbon credits.

Summary: Underground coal gasification (UCG) involves injecting steam and air or oxygen (O2) into a coal seam from a surface well. The injected gases react with coal to form a combustible gas which is brought to the surface in a production well, cleaned and used as a fuel or chemical feedstock. A cavity is formed as the coal burns and the roof is allowed to collapse. This process results in lateral growth of the gasifier in the seam and is allowed to continue until the quality of the product gas declines. When this occurs the seam is re-ignited at a new location further along the gasifier. Once the coal within the underground gasifier has been exhausted, new injection and production wells are drilled alongside the exhausted gasifier and the process is repeated.

UCG has the potential to exploit coal resources which are either uneconomic to work by conventional underground coal extraction, or inaccessible due to depth, geology or other mining and safety considerations. The successful development of UCG will not only depend on advances in the use of technology but also on demonstrating that a clean energy can be produced without detriment to the environment. As a method of exploiting coal, UCG represents a substantial environmental improvement on the combination of coal mining and surface combustion of coal.

Energy Mix Strategies for oil importing country – Important in the scenario of energy security and global warming:

Energy Mix Strategies for oil importing country – Important in the scenario of energy security and global warming:

A. We are aware of the problems of environmental pollution and the adverse consequences of global warming causing due to CO2 emission. To restrict environmental pollution, to mitigate the CO2 emission and rate of increase of CO₂ concentration in the atmosphere, responsive long term energy mix strategies exploiting the maximum potential of non-greenhouse gas emitting energy sources need to be developed and implemented as rapidly as possible. The future energy mix will not only depend on environmental issues, but also will depend on technological, economic, supply, logistics and political factors. It is generally accepted that for many decades fossil fuels will continue to be the major energy source world over. Natural gas being the lowest fossil fuel greenhouse gas emitter will increase the share in energy scenario world over. Countries having or exporting fossil fuels cannot easily turn away from their use and likewise the industrially & economically dynamic countries of Asia such as China, Japan and India cannot radically shift from fossil fuels towards uncertain and currently costly renewable for their growing power needs.

B. National and regional factors are the most important in guiding country's energy mix. Percentage share of energy differ considerably today and they will in the future. For example, today China is more than 90% dependent on various forms of fossil fuels. On the other hand, France and Sweden have reduced their dependence on fossil fuels to less than 50% and 35% respectively by using nuclear and hydro-power to a great extent. Moreover, out of all the fossil fuels coal is the workhorse of global electric power sector and is used to generate more than half of the electricity world consumes. Coal is also world’s most abundant fossil fuel, with supplies projected to last almost 250 years or more. As coal-fired power plants generally produce the lowest-cost electricity and coal is abundant, most of the country’s economic and energy security depend on the continued use of the fuel.

C. Therefore, on the global level, it is difficult to make a policy decisions to foster a reduced reliance on fossil fuel. Decision makers are confused on how to proceed for country’s energy mix for the future as there is general support for cost effective energy efficiency techniques and on the supply side an endorsement of an increased use of renewable and sustainable energy sources. In fact, both the efforts are necessary at present; but ‘renewable and sustainable energy sources’ have limited potential over the near term. However, in the developed and industrialized countries, the significant energy efficiency gains and use of renewable energy sources have been seen over the past two decades, that changed the dependence on fossil fuels and energy scenario to a great extent on their industrial and residential front.

D. The supply potential from renewable energy sources, at present, is difficult to assess since they are only emerging technologies and currently not suitable for meeting large energy demand of a country. With differing relevance for the various renewable energy sources, technological improvements are needed and basic challenges exist in reducing costs, improving efficiency and reliability, solving energy storage problems and integrating the technologies into existing energy systems. In most of the developed countries many decision makers in the opinion that, non-hydroelectric renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind will not be economically competitive for large scale production in the foreseeable future and that they will play no more than a limited role in the decades to come. They opine that, even with adequate support and subsidies the share of such renewable energy sources could reach only 5-8% (including about 3% non-commercial energy share) of primary energy supply by 2020.

E. Fortunately, hydroelectric has already been extensively developed and in use in Europe and North America (some 50% of the estimated maximum economic potential). Its greatest potential lies primarily in Asia, South America and Africa, where the trend will likely be towards small capacity units as concerns grow about the damaging environmental and social impacts of large dams.

F. Energy security and implementing proper energy mix strategies for oil importing countries are very much crucial especially in the scenario of rapid industrialization. For those countries, in my opinion, renewable energy must be developed in parallel with nuclear power and a clean-up of coal-fired power station technology, if these nations are to meet increasing demand without relying on enormous and potentially debilitating natural gas imports. For a nation the provision of sufficient, affordable and secure energy is crucial for any modern economy. Many countries are facing the challenge of bridging the widening gap between energy supply and demand. At the same time, across the globe, those same economies are facing challenges such as climate change, limited resources and rising costs. Therefore, for oil importing countries, energy mix should shift more towards, nuclear power and clean coal technology.

G. There are very large amounts of remaining oil, gas and coal left in the world and in the absence of concerted government initiatives, it may take many years before alternative energy sources such as wind and solar become a significant part of the world’s energy mix. It is true that some renewable sources such as bio-fuels and wind have attained ten-fold production increases throughout the past ten years. However, global energy demand is increasing at such a rate that, if we ignore hydro-electricity, renewable energy - as a proportion of total energy supply - may well remain at less than 2 per cent of the total market for many years to come. It may be noted here that, global climate change may be best addressed in the short term by energy conservation, by increasing fuel efficiency, and by subsurface storage of the carbon dioxide that results from burning fossil fuels. At the same time, the greatest advantages of nuclear power is that it avoids the wide variety of environmental problems arising from burning fossil fuels, apart from economically generating a high amount of electrical energy in one single plant using small amount of fuel.

H. Therefore, concerted efforts by such economies, in order to have secured energy for their sustainable developments, should involve large scale nuclear expansion, the development of clean coal-fired power stations, implementation of hydro-electric power to maximum potential and a increase in renewable energy sources such as solar and wind.

Energy security – ‘Clean Coal’ has potential to change the world from pariah to paragon of virtue in high oil price regime:

Energy security – ‘Clean Coal’ has potential to change the world from pariah to paragon of virtue in high oil price regime:

A. The thirst of populous emerging economies for energy and the industrial countries’ sustained need for energy will ensure a further rise in demand. However, it looks as if the supply of oil, and later also natural gas, will not keep pace with this demand. Only by leveraging every possible means will it be possible to compensate the imbalances emerging on the horizon. However, during the transition to the renewable sources of energy such as wind and solar age, an energy gap will have to be filled.

B. With oil currently trading at around USD 140/bbl, coal-to-liquid technology is already an interesting alternative from a purely commercial point of view. Coal offers great potential as a substitute for oil and natural gas in the medium term, but so far its versatility has been underestimated. Going forward, coal could attract more attention in all three major energy sectors – power generation, the heating market and transport – provided that the right technologies delivering higher efficiency and lower environmental burdens take root. Environmental risks emphasize need for “clean coal”. Global warming is one of the biggest dangers facing human existence on earth, and combating this danger is therefore one of the greatest challenges. Since coal causes 40% of global CO2 emissions, only advanced technology can pave the way to a better future. The required quantum leaps in technology could, however, open the doors to the global mass markets. The need for investment is very high not only in emerging economies like China and India but also in US and Europe. CO2-free coal-fired power plants could become a milestone on the way to a better energy future in spite of their additional fuel consumption.

C. Worldwide prospects for energy is actually quite good, but only if all possible levers are used. These include steps – apart from urgently needed conservation and efficiency-enhancing strategies – to diversify the range of energy carriers with an even greater drive to mobilize renewable energies and to continue developing potential alternative technologies. In public debate about our energy options after the petroleum age virtually no consideration is given to coal or else it gets very bad reviews. In the developed countries, coal is usually considered synonymous with a dangerous climate killer; in the developing countries, for inhuman labor conditions in the mining industry, the talk is of ‘blood coal’. At best, coal is given credit for its valuable contribution to energy security during the industrialization era.

D. Today, coal is used in the industrial countries above all as a source of fuel for generating electricity, for the heating market and for metal production. In some of the emerging economies, coal is still used in some places to fire steam engines. Going forward, coal could attract much more attention in all three major energy sectors – power generation, heating and transport – provided that the right technologies with higher efficiency levels and a low environmental impact take root. In this sense, the versatility of coal has been underestimated. As a substitute for the hydrocarbon fuels oil and natural gas, which will become increasingly scarce in the relatively near future, coal offers considerable potential for improving our energy structures in future. However, only advanced technologies and innovations will be able to pave the way for coal into a better future.

E. As mentioned above, environmental risk emphasizes need for “clean coal”. Global warming is one of the biggest dangers facing human existence on earth, and combating this danger is therefore one of the greatest challenges facing mankind. Fossil fuels, especially those that pose the greatest threat to the earth’s climate, will only have a future if they can be reinvented from an ecological standpoint. Coal accounts for 40% of global output of carbon dioxide (CO2). The ‘bridge to the future’ must therefore lead to ‘clean coal’, which if possible has to be climate neutral and thus acceptable to the public at large. If ‘King Coal’, the mythical figure of the coalmining saga, stops wearing a black robe in future and instead dons an environmentally-friendly white robe, his days will not be numbered and he may go on to prosper the second time round. Until renewable sources of energy are finally mature and established enough to shoulder the burden of the world energy supply largely on their own, the purified ‘clean coal’ may develop into one of the biggest sources of hope for a more secure energy supply.

F. One advantage of coal is that it offers the greatest range of global reserves among the fossil fuels. Plenty of coal reserve, up to about more than 200 years worth, is readily available, almost all over the world. By contrast, the ranges for oil (42 years) and natural gas (63 years) are much smaller.

G. The search for alternatives to conventional fuels did not seem to be an urgent task in late 1998 when a barrel of oil cost less than USD 10. Not quite 10 years later, with oil going for an annual average price of USD 65 in 2006. The most prominent participants in the contest for the fuels of the future are:

(i) First-generation bio-fuels are increasing in popularity in the most diverse countries of the world, such as Brazil, the US and Germany. In Brazil, they have long since become commercially competitive. Research on the second generation, the synthetic bio-fuels (biomass-to-liquids, or BTL), is continuing briskly.

(ii) Natural gas has been a common fuel in some countries for years. More appears to be possible if the catalytic conversion of natural gas proves able to secure the availability of a synthetic fuel, so called GTL (gas-to-liquids), on an industrial scale. GTL and BTL will mean fewer emissions and higher efficiency.

(iii) By means of liquefaction (coal-to-liquids, CTL), coal may directly replace oil even as a fuel. Thanks to higher reserve and resource ranges, coal as a substitute would clearly have an advantage over fuels based on natural gas.

(iv) Nuclear energy will be one of the major contributors to the world energy sources. Although, there is furious opposition against nuclear energy in some part of the world, the advantage of its potential of delivery of clean energy is the major plus point makes it better option.

H. A total of USD 10 trillion is expected to be invested in power generating plants around the globe up to 2030, with over USD 2 trillion being invested in China alone. The need for investment is very high all over the world. For investments, not only the direct costs but also the implications for the world climate will increasingly gain importance. This holds all the more so as over the past 30 years the share of CO2 emissions from coal has risen from 35% to 40% – with total emissions rising by 70% globally. One much more revolutionary project is a plan to develop emission-free coal-fired generating plants. Upstream and downstream CO2 sequestration, for which there are several different methods, aims for climate conservation. Thus, new power generation technology for fewer emissions will become the backbone of industrialization.

Green coal for power - To take care of post-Kyoto issues from energy security point-of-view:

Green coal for power - To take care of post-Kyoto issues from energy security point-of-view: a. Coal is the world’s most abundant and important source of primary energy. Turning a potential pollutant into a clean, green fuel for economical power production has become a matter for concern on a global scale. Coal continues to dominate the energy industries as the single most important and widely-used fuel. Delivering around 27 per cent of the world’s consumption of primary energy, almost half of which is used for electricity generation; reserves of coal are spread worldwide throughout some 100 developed and developing countries, sufficient to meet global needs for the next 250 years. b. Although a combination of economic and environmental pressures has forced the closure of older, inefficient, fossil fuelled thermal stations, the massive growth in power demand on a world scale will continue to be met predominantly by coal-fired plant for the foreseeable future. In many of the rapidly developing and industrializing regions of the world the rate of consumption of coal as a primary fuel for electricity generation is actually increasing. In energy-hungry India alone, coal-burn for power generation is forecast to more than double in the next few years to 350 million tonnes per year. Annual coal production in China, the world’s largest producer, has rocketed to over 1,500 million tonnes. Nevertheless, post-Kyoto issues have heightened environmental awareness, forcing the pace of technological change in the use of this abundant but potentially polluting fuel for power generation. The environmental threat posed by the release of even more millions of tonnes of toxic pollutants, acidic and greenhouse gases from both new and existing coal-burning power stations is widely accepted. Currently, signatories to the Kyoto Protocol are focusing on solutions to the problem of global warming, including the reduction of CO2 and other ‘greenhouse’ gases. In many other non- signatory countries, major programmes have been implemented by utilities and power producers to reduce SOx, NOx and CO2 emissions. Additional environmental concerns have also emerged, including the potential health impacts of trace emissions of mercury and the effects of particulate matter on people with respiratory problems. c. In contrast with both natural gas and LPG, hard coal can contain a wide range of compounds including sulfur in addition to useful hydrocarbons. The percentage of sulfur can vary widely, with relatively low concentrations in the highest quality anthracite and very high amounts in lignite, generating large volumes of SOx. As well as the need to treat the fuel prior to firing and control closely the combustion process itself to limit the production of nitrogen oxides, coal-fired stations based on conventional pulverized coal technology can only reduce SOx emissions through the use of post-combustion treatments. Further problems still remain through the safe disposal of fly ash which can contain high levels of toxic compounds including heavy metals. d. Enormous environmental problems faced by operators of older, coal-fired generating plants all over the world, plants were forced to take drastic action after various public protests about the deadly effects of SOx emissions and other emissions. Emissions from coal and lignite-fired units at various power generating stations caused widespread damage, killing livestock and crops downwind of the plant and causing respiratory illness in the population in many countries. The plants were forced to cut output. This tends to place an unacceptably high strain on the commercial viability of an existing power station in many of the developing nations and represents a completely uneconomic option for the majority of obsolescent installations. Power producers in industrialized developed countries are therefore adopting a variety of leading-edge clean-coal technologies for electricity generation. e. New clean coal technologies are providing an attractive and economically viable option to post-combustion systems. Applying the latest combustion, steam and process technologies in new power plant or upgrading existing coal-fired generating facilities provides significant improvements in thermal efficiency, reducing environmental impact and energy costs to the consumer. At the same time, higher thermal efficiencies result directly in reduced fuel costs, improving profitability and market position for the independent power producer. (i) For new and smaller coal-fuelled generating plant, boilers using well-proven circulating fluidized-bed CFB technology provide a cost-effective and efficient system capable of meeting current and future environmental standards. They are now being widely used and successfully operated in coal-fired generating units, burning a very wide range of coal and other fuels with widely differing heat values and mineral content. These can typically include anthracite, semi-anthracite, bituminous and sub-bituminous coal, lignite and even ‘gob’ – a form of high-ash bituminous coal waste. (ii) As an alternative to direct combustion based systems, coal gasification is becoming increasingly attractive, with Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) technology offering one of the best ‘clean’ options for effective power production. Gasification systems use steam and controlled amounts of air or oxygen under high temperatures and pressures to react with coal to form clean synthetic gas or ‘syngas’. Current systems provide efficient clean-up of the gas-stream to produce a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen which can be used subsequently as a ‘clean’ fuel or a basic feedstock for liquefaction. f. Used as a fuel for power generation in a typical IGCC generating plant, a syngas-fired gas turbine drives a generator, with exhaust heat from the gas turbine recovered to produce steam to power a steam turbine in conventional ‘combined cycle’. IGCC power generating systems are presently being developed and operated in Europe and the US, with commercial systems capable of operating at thermal efficiencies approaching 50 per cent. NOx and Sox emissions levels are minimized with the potential for carbon-capture and sequestration of the CO in the sysngas stream being actively researched as design strategies for near-term and future coal-based IGCC plants. Elemental sulfur is removed from the syngas before combustion and is a highly saleable commercial byproduct. If the gasifier is fed with oxygen rather than air, the flue gas contains highly concentrated CO2 which can readily be captured, at about half the cost of that from conventional plants. g. As an alternative to the direct use of syngas as a fuel for electricity generation, it can also be processed using modern gas-to-liquids (GTL) technologies to produce a wide range of liquid hydrocarbon fuels such as gasoline and diesel oil. Coal-to-oil is a long-established technology in coal-rich South Africa. h. Nevertheless, clean coal technology is moving very rapidly in the direction of coal gasification, with a second stage designed to produce a concentrated and pressurized carbon dioxide stream followed by separation and geological storage. This has the potential to provide extremely low emissions of conventional coal pollutants, and as low-as-engineered carbon dioxide emissions – a vital step in the fight to prevent irreversible climate change.

Coal is Essential for Energy Security for many – Strategies to enlarge supply base and reduce environmental impacts are the prerequisites:

Coal is Essential for Energy Security for many – Strategies to enlarge supply base and reduce environmental impacts are the prerequisites:

A. More and more frequent environmental problems and disasters – floods, forest fires, tornados, air pollution in big cities – cause growing concerns everywhere. Energy harvesting, conversion, production and use contribute to these environmental burdens.

Hence, improving the environmental performance of the energy sector is of paramount importance. Thus, wider application of cleaner fuels and conversion technologies is a key element in the strategy to improve the environmental performance of the energy sector. Further, the lower price of coal as compare to petroleum based fuels; the interest in coal is renewed because of the more even geopolitical distribution of coal reserves and of larger supply bases of coal allover the world.

In fact, the environmental concerns about coal are not associated with coal itself, but with its utilization in different stages of the energy chain. Novel and more environmentally friendly technologies for coal utilization, commonly known as “Clean Coal Technologies” (CCT), are believed to be able to bring coal back into the picture. Hence, CCT recently enjoy a growing interest almost all parts of the world. At present, this interest mostly focuses on cleaner coal conversion through increased efficiency and CO2 capture technologies, for which large R&D efforts are ongoing worldwide.

B. Market implementation of CCT is expected to cause an increase in coal use. Coal demand could also rise significantly because the recent sharp increase in oil prices has a lower impact on coal than on gas prices. This is explained by the more favorable geopolitical distribution of coal reserves compared to that of gas. As a result, coal has become cheaper in relative terms than oil and gas. All in all, in a scenario of soaring oil & gas prices, coal is predicted to be the energy source with the fastest growing demand. The expected increase in coal demand for power generation raises the question of its secure availability in the future. Thus, enlargement of the coal supply base is essential throughout the world, with adoption of cleaner technology.

C. The enlargement of the coal supply base can take place in four main directions:

(a) More powerful mapping techniques for coal reserves - Modern geophysics and seismic techniques, improve mine planning and exploitation by reducing geological uncertainties and increasing extraction efficiencies. At the same time, they can reduce environmental externalities and energy use for coal extraction.

(b) Improvement of existing under-ground mining technologies - Underground (deep) coal mining accounts for about 60% of world coal production. Current best coal recovery rates for underground mining are 50-60% for the “room-and-pillar” technology and about 75% for “longwall” mining. The implementation of modern automated and computerized mining technologies can increase these recovery rates.

(c) Research and development for underground coal gasification - Underground gasification of coal deposits which are not technically or economically exploitable (anymore) with conventional mining technologies, can add enormous coal supply potential in Europe and worldwide. At present underground coal gasification is at an experimental stage. Significant further efforts are necessary to make it technically and economically viable. In many of the countries like India etc., commercialization of underground gasification technologies may reduce the energy import dependence and enhance energy security scenario, apart from creating new employment.

(d) Utilization of coalmine methane (CMM) gas - Methane gas, released from coalmines, has always raised serious safety and environmental concerns. Methane is highly explosive when accumulated in confined areas. It is also a powerful greenhouse gas with 20- times stronger global warming potential than carbon dioxide. On the other hand, CMM, which consists mainly of natural gas, is a suitable clean fuel. The capture and useful utilization of CMM can bring important synergy benefits in terms of enhanced security of supply and better environmental and safety performance of coal mining.

D. Therefore, for realizing the full potential of CCT, coal is sufficiently

(a) Abundant… only if we keep working on the enhancement of coal reserves,

(b) Cheap… as long as the supply continues to match the demand,

(c) Reliable… as long as the supplies are diversified.

To reach market maturity, clean coal technologies, covering extraction, preparation and conversion, need a long term vision and investment security. In the present pre-commercial stage they need firm political commitment and further R&D support.

‘Carbon sequestration’ - Greatest challenge of clean coal technology to deliver "zero emissions" in reality:

‘Carbon sequestration’ - Greatest challenge of clean coal technology to deliver "zero emissions" in reality:

A present trend of clean coal technology is moving rapidly towards a very interesting phase, realizing efficiency improvements of coal. In fact, this clean coal technology together with the use of natural gas and renewables such as wind will not provide the deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions necessary to meet future national targets. Naturally, a plant to produce hydrogen from coal and sequester emissions will be the world’s zero emission coal-fired plant – as envisaged for ‘FutureGen’ project.

As discussed earlier, the clean coal technology field is moving in the direction of coal gasification with a second stage so as to produce a concentrated and pressurized carbon dioxide stream followed by its separation and geological storage. This technology has the potential to provide what may be called "zero emissions" - in reality, extremely low emissions of the conventional coal pollutants, and as low-as-engineered carbon dioxide emissions.

A. The greatest challenge now is to sequester emissions by carbon capture and geological storage technology. The technology, known as carbon sequestration, has attracted global attention from industries and governments that are eager to capture and bottle up the gas that can linger in the atmosphere for decades.

B. Carbon capture and sequestration begins with the separation and capture of CO₂ from power plant flue gas and other stationary CO₂ sources. At present, this process is costly and energy intensive, accounting for the majority of the cost of sequestration. However, analysis shows the potential for cost reductions of 30–45 percent for CO₂ capture. Post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-combustion capture systems being developed are expected to be capable of capturing more than 90 percent of flue gas CO₂.

C. The primary function of carbon sequestration research and development (R&D) objectives are:

(1) lowering the cost and energy penalty associated with CO₂ capture from large point sources; and

(2) improving the understanding of factors affecting CO₂ storage permanence, capacity, and safety in geologic formations and terrestrial ecosystems.

D. After capturing of carbon the next step is to sequester (store) the CO_2; which has mainly two processes - (i) The primary means for carbon storage are injecting CO₂ into geologic formations or (ii) using terrestrial applications.

(i) Geologic sequestration involves taking the CO₂ that has been captured from power plants and other stationary sources and storing it in deep underground geologic formations in such a way that CO₂ will remain permanently stored. Geologic formations such as oil and gas reservoirs, unmineable coal seams, and underground saline formations are potential options for storing CO₂. Storage in basalt formations and organic rich shales is also being investigated.

(ii) Another form of sequestration is ‘terrestrial sequestration’, which involves the net removal of CO₂ from the atmosphere by plants and microorganisms that use CO₂ in their natural cycles. Terrestrial sequestration requires the development of technologies to quantify with a high degree of precision and reliability the amount of carbon stored in a given ecosystem.

E. Any carbon sequestration program should involve (a) Core R&D, and (b) Demonstration & Deployment.

(a) Core R&D – Core R&D accomplished through laboratory and pilot-scale research, develops new technologies and systems for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from industrial sources. Core R&D integrates basic research and computational sciences to study advanced materials and energy systems. It focuses on few major areas for technology development: (i) CO₂ Capture, (ii) Carbon Storage, (iii) Monitoring, Mitigation, and Verification, (iv) Non-CO₂ Greenhouse Gas Control, and (v) Breakthrough Concepts.

(b) Demonstration & Deployment – It speeds the development of new technologies through commercial opportunities and collaboration with Govt. departments. Core R&D scientists also learn practical lessons from these demonstration projects and are helpful to develop further technology solutions and innovations.

As mentioned above, this system along with use of natural gas and renewable energy sources such as wind, solar etc., will be advantageous in order to mitigate to a great extent in greenhouse gas emissions necessary to meet future national targets. Many countries see "zero emissions" coal technology as a core element of its future energy supply in a carbon-constrained world. They have program to develop and demonstrate the technology and have commercial designs for plants with an electricity cost of only 10% greater than conventional coal plants available by 2012. Australia is very well endowed with carbon dioxide storage sites near major carbon dioxide sources, but as elsewhere, demonstration plants will be needed to gain public acceptance and show that the storage is permanent. In general, "zero emissions" technology seems to have the potential for low avoided cost for greenhouse gas emissions.

‘FutureGen’ project - to design, build and operate a nearly emission-free coal-based electricity and hydrogen:

‘FutureGen’ project - to design, build and operate a nearly emission-free coal-based electricity and hydrogen:

The clean coal technology field is moving very rapidly in the direction of coal gasification with a second stage so as to produce a concentrated and pressurised carbon dioxide stream followed by its separation and geological storage. At present the high cost of carbon capture and storage renders the option uneconomic. But a lot of work is being done by many of the research institutes, to improve the economic viability of this system.

More recently department of energy (DOE) of Federal Govt. of the USA has announced ‘FutureGen’ project to design, build and operate a nearly emission-free coal-based electricity and hydrogen production plant. It will use cutting-edge technologies to generate electricity while capturing and permanently storing carbon dioxide deep beneath the earth. The integration of these technologies is what makes FutureGen unique. Researchers and industry have made great progress advancing technologies for coal gasification, electricity generation, emissions control, carbon dioxide capture and storage, and hydrogen production. But these technologies have yet to be put together and tested at a single plant - an essential step for technical and commercial viability.

Therefore, the FutureGen initiative would have comprised a coal gasification plant with additional water-shift reactor, to produce hydrogen and carbon dioxide. About one million tones of CO₂ would then be separated by membrane technology and sequestered geologically. The hydrogen would have been be burned in a power generating plant and in fuel cells. The project was designed to validate the technical feasibility and economic viability of near-zero emission coal-based generation. Construction of FutureGen was due to start in 2009, for operation in 2012.

Coal gasification processes –

(a) In conventional plants coal, often pulverised, is burned with excess air (to give complete combustion), resulting in very dilute carbon dioxide at the rate of 800 to 1200 g/kWh.

(b) Gasification converts the coal to burnable gas with the maximum amount of potential energy from the coal being in the gas.

(c) In Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) the first gasification step is pyrolysis, from 400°C up, where the coal in the absence of oxygen rapidly gives carbon-rich char and hydrogen-rich volatiles.

(d) In the second step the char is gasified from 700°C up to yield gas, leaving ash. With oxygen feed, the gas is not diluted with nitrogen.

(e) The key reactions today are C + O₂ to CO, and the water gas reaction: C + H₂O (steam) to CO & H₂ - syngas, which reaction is endothermic.

(f) In gasification, including that using oxygen, the O₂ supply is much less than required for full combustion, so as to yield CO and H₂.

(g) The hydrogen has a heat value of 121 MJ/kg - about five times that of the coal, so it is a very energy-dense fuel.

(h) However, the air separation plant to produce oxygen consumes up to 20% of the gross power of the whole IGCC plant system.

(i) This syngas can then be burned in a gas turbine, the exhaust gas from which can then be used to raise steam for a steam turbine, hence the "combined cycle" in IGCC.

(j) To achieve a much fuller clean coal technology in the future, the water-shift reaction will become a key part of the process so that:

(i) C + O₂ gives CO, and

(ii) C + H₂O gives CO & H₂, then the

(iii) CO + H₂O gives CO₂ & H₂ (the water-shift reaction).

(k) The products are then concentrated CO₂ which can be captured, and hydrogen. (There is also some hydrogen from the coal pyrolysis), which is the final fuel for the gas turbine.

(k) Overall thermal efficiency for oxygen-blown coal gasification, including carbon dioxide capture and sequestration, is about 73%.

(l) Using the hydrogen in a gas turbine for electricity generation is efficient, so the overall system has long-term potential to achieve an efficiency of up to 60%.

‘Clean Coal Technology (CCT)’ – methods to remove pollutants from coal.

‘Clean Coal Technology (CCT)’ – methods to remove pollutants from coal.

Carbon dioxide from burning coal is the main focus of attention today, since it is implicated in global warming, and the Kyoto Protocol requires that emissions decline, notwithstanding increasing energy demand.

A. Capture & separation of Carbon dioxide - A number of means exist to capture carbon dioxide from gas streams, but they have not yet been optimised for the scale required in coal-burning power plants. The focus has often been on obtaining pure CO₂ for industrial purposes rather than reducing CO₂ levels in power plant emissions. Capture of carbon dioxide from flue gas streams following combustion in air is expensive as the carbon dioxide concentration is only about 14% at best. This treats carbon dioxide like any other pollutant and as flue gases are passed through an amine solution the CO₂ is absorbed. It can later be released by heating the solution. This amine scrubbing process is also used for taking CO₂ out of natural gas. There is an energy cost involved. Captured carbon dioxide gas can be put to good use, even on a commercial basis, for enhanced oil recovery. Injecting carbon dioxide into deep, unmineable coal seams where it is adsorbed to displace methane (effectively: natural gas) is another potential use or disposal strategy.

B. Coal arriving at a power plant contains mineral content that needs to be removed, in order to make it clean, before it is burnt. A number of processes are available to remove unwanted matter and make the coal burn more efficiently.

(a) Coal cleaning by washing - Coal washing involves grinding the coal into smaller pieces and passing it through a process called gravity separation. One technique involves feeding the coal into barrels containing a fluid that has a density which causes the coal to float, while unwanted material sinks and is removed from the fuel mix. The coal is then pulverised and prepared for burning.

(b) Gasification of coal – The Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant is a means of using coal and steam to produce hydrogen and carbon monoxide (CO) which are then burned in a gas turbine with secondary steam turbine (ie combined cycle) to produce electricity.

Coal gasification plants are favoured by some because they are flexible and have high levels of efficiency. The gas can be used to power electricity generators, or it can be used elsewhere, i.e. in transportation or the chemical industry. In Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) systems, coal is not combusted directly but reacts with oxygen and steam to form a "syngas" (primarily hydrogen). After being cleaned, it is burned in a gas turbine to generate electricity and to produce steam to power a steam turbine. Coal gasification plants are seen as a primary component of a zero-emissions system. However, the technology remains unproven on a widespread commercial scale.

(c) Removing pollutants from coal - Burning coal produces a range of pollutants that harm the environment: Sulphur dioxide (acid rain); nitrogen oxides (ground-level ozone) and particulates (affects people's respiratory systems). There are a number of options to reduce these emissions:

(i) Sulphur dioxide (SO2) - Flue gas desulphursation (FGD) systems are used to remove sulphur dioxide. "Wet scrubbers" are the most widespread method and can be up to 99% effective. A mixture of limestone and water is sprayed over the flue gas and this mixture reacts with the SO2 to form gypsum (a calcium sulphate), which is removed and used in the construction industry.

(ii) Nitrogen oxides (NOx) - NOx reduction methods include the use of "low NOx burners". These specially designed burners restrict the amount of oxygen available in the hottest part of the combustion chamber where the coal is burned. This minimises the formation of the gas and requires less post-combustion treatment.

(iii) Particulates emissions - Electrostatic precipitators can remove more than 99% of particulates from the flue gas. The system works by creating an electrical field to create a charge on particles which are then attracted by collection plates. Other removal methods include fabric filters and wet particulate scrubbers.

Clean coal technology (CCT) - A discussion

Clean coal technology (CCT) - A discussion

Coal when burned is the dirtiest of all fossil fuels. A range of technologies are being used and developed to reduce the environmental impact of coal-fired power stations. Thus, clean coal technology (CCT) is the name attributed to coal chemically washed of minerals and impurities, sometimes gasified, burned and the resulting flue gases treated with steam with the purpose of removing sulfur dioxide, and reburned so as to make the carbon dioxide in the flue gas economically recoverable.

A. It is a known fact that, the burning of coal, a fossil fuel, is the principal causes of anthropogenic climate change and global warming. In fact, the byproducts of coal combustion are very hazardous to the environment if not properly contained. This is seen to be the technology's largest challenge, both from the practical and public relations perspectives. While it is possible to remove most of the sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate (PM) emissions from the coal-burning process, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions will be more difficult to address. Therefore, fact regarding the coal remains:

(a) Coal is a vital fuel in most parts of the world.

(b) Burning coal without adding to global carbon dioxide levels is a major technological challenge which is being addressed.

(c) The most promising "clean coal" technology involves using the coal to make hydrogen from water, then burying the resultant carbon dioxide by-product and burning the hydrogen.

(d) The greatest challenge is bringing the cost of this down sufficiently for "clean coal" to compete with nuclear power on the basis of near-zero emissions for base-load power.

B. In relation to clean coal technology, a terminology ‘carbon capture and storage’ (CCS) is being discussed. CCS is nothing but method of capturing the carbon dioxide, preventing the greenhouse gas entering the atmosphere, and storing it deep underground by various ways, such as

(a) CO2 pumped into disused coal fields displaces methane which can be used as fuel,

(b) CO2 may be pumped into and stored safely in saline aquifers, or

(c) CO2 pumped into oil fields helps maintain pressure, making extraction easier.

A range of approaches of CCS have been developed and have proved to be technically feasible. They have yet to be made available on a large-scale commercial basis because of the costs involved.

C. Clean coal technologies are continually developing. Today, efficiencies of 46% can be achieved by implementing the best available technology. With further research into techniques such as Ultra-supercritical combustion, efficiencies above 50% are envisaged in the near future. Work is underway to exploit the opportunities of capturing and storing CO2, which is an inevitable by-product of the thermal use of all fossil fuels. Coupled with integrated gasification, coal could in this way provide a source of low-carbon hydrogen for fuelling transport without producing local emissions. There will be challenges in bringing these technologies to market, but with the right mix of research investment and market incentives, coal may stake a place in a sustainable and secure energy future.

D. To summarise, burning coal, such as for power generation, gives rise to a variety of wastes which must be controlled or at least accounted for. So-called "clean coal" technologies are a variety of evolving responses to late 20th century environmental concerns, including that of global warming due to carbon dioxide releases to the atmosphere. However, many of the elements have in fact been applied for many years, and they will be only briefly mentioned here:

(i) Coal cleaning by 'washing' has been standard practice in developed countries for some time. It reduces emissions of ash and sulfur dioxide when the coal is burned.

(ii) Electrostatic precipitators and fabric filters can remove 99% of the fly ash from the flue gases - these technologies are in widespread use.

(iii) Flue gas desulfurisation reduces the output of sulfur dioxide to the atmosphere by up to 97%, the task depending on the level of sulfur in the coal and the extent of the reduction. It is widely used where needed in developed countries.

(iv) Low-NOx burners allow coal-fired plants to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 40%. Coupled with re-burning techniques NOx can be reduced 70% and selective catalytic reduction can clean up 90% of NOx emissions.

(v) Increased efficiency of plant - up to 45% thermal efficiency now (and 50% expected in future) means that newer plants create less emissions per kWh than older ones.

(vi) Advanced technologies such as Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) and Pressurised Fluidised Bed Combustion (PFBC) will enable higher thermal efficiencies still - up to 50% in the future.

(vii) Ultra-clean coal from new processing technologies which reduce ash below 0.25% and sulfur to very low levels mean that pulverised coal might be fed directly into gas turbines with combined cycle and burned at high thermal efficiency.

(viii) Gasification, including underground gasification in situ, uses steam and oxygen to turn the coal into carbon monoxide and hydrogen.

(ix) Sequestration refers to disposal of liquid carbon dioxide, once captured, into deep geological strata.

E. Discussion - Many experts think, the concept of clean coal is said to be a solution to climate change and global warming. Whereas, environmental groups believe it is nothing but another way of making everybody fool, in other words, it is ‘green-wash’. Environmentalists say, with this technology emission and wastes are not avoided, but are transferred from one waste stream to another. They opine that, coal can never be clean. Critics of the planned power plants assert that there is no such thing as "clean coal" and that the plant will still release large amounts of pollutants compared to renewable energy sources such as wind power and solar power. A good deal of investment in research and development and also in implementation of pollutant free renewable energy (such as wind power and solar power) has to augmented, to make the world very clean, to make the required electricity generation fully green.

Classification of coal based on volatile matter and coking power of clean material

Classification of coal based on volatile matter and coking power of clean material

Coal is a readily combustible rock containing more than 50 percent by weight of carbonaceous material, formed from compaction and indurations of variously altered plant remains similar to those in peat.

After a considerable amount of time, heat, and burial pressure, it is metamorphosed from peat to lignite. Lignite is considered to be "immature" coal at this stage of development because it is still somewhat light in color and it remains soft.

Lignite increases in maturity by becoming darker and harder and is then classified as sub-bituminous coal. After a continuous process of burial and alteration, chemical and physical changes occur until the coal is classified as bituminous - dark and hard coal.

Bituminous coal ignites easily and burns long with a relatively long flame. If improperly fired bituminous coal is characterized with excess smoke and soot.

Anthracite coal is the last classification, the ultimate maturation. Anthracite coal is very hard and shiny.

Class	Volatile matter (weight %)	General description
101	<>	Anthracites
102	3.1 - 9.0
201	9.1 - 13.5	Dry steam coals	Low volatile steam coals
202	13.6 - 15.0
203	15.1 - 17.0	Coking steams coals
204	17.1 - 19.5
206	19.1 - 19.5	Heat altered low volatile steam coals
301	19.6 - 32.0	Prime coking coals	Medium volatile coals
305	19.6 - 32.0	Mainly heat altered coals
306	19.6 - 32.0
401	32.1 - 36.0	Very strongly coking coals	High volatile coals
402	> 36.0
501	32.1 - 36.0	Strongly coking coals
502	> 36.0
601	32.1 - 36.0	Medium coking coals
602	> 36.0
701	32.1	Weakly coking coals
702	> 36.0
801	32.1 - 36.0	Very weakly coking coals
802	> 36.0
901	32.1 - 36.0	Non-coking coals
902	> 36.0

Volatile matter - dry mineral matter free basis. In coal, those products, exclusive of moisture, given off as gas and vapor determined analytically.

Anthracite coal creates a steady and clean flame and is preferred for domestic heating. Furthermore it burn longer with more heat than the other types.

Typical Sulfur Content in Coal

Anthracite Coal : 0.6 - 0.77 weight %

Bituminous Coal : 0.7 - 4.0 weight %

Lignite Coal : 0.4 weight %

Typical Moisture Content in Coal

Anthracite Coal : 2.8 - 16.3 weight %

Bituminous Coal : 2.2 - 15.9 weight %

Lignite Coal : 39 weight %

Typical Fixed Carbon Content in Coal

Anthracite Coal : 80.5 - 85.7 weight %

Bituminous Coal : 44.9-78.2 weight %

Lignite Coal : 31.4 weight %

Typical Bulk Density of Coal

Anthracite Coal : 50 - 58 (lb/ft³), 800 - 929 (kg/m³)

Bituminous Coal : 42 - 57 (lb/ft³), 673 - 913 (kg/m³)

Lignite Coal : 40 - 54 (lb/ft³), 641 - 865 (kg/m³)

Typical Ash Content in Coal

Anthracite Coal : 9.7 - 20.2 weight %

Bituminous Coal : 3.3-11.7 weight %

Lignite Coal : 4.2 weight %